Skip to content
Delewarellc

Statutory conversion

A legal process for changing an entity's form (LLC to Corporation, or vice versa) under 6 Del. C. § 18-211.

Glossary: Statutory conversion. A legal process for changing an entity's form (LLC to Corporation, or vice versa) under 6 Del. C. § 18-211.
Statutory conversion: A legal process for changing an entity's form (LLC to Corporation, or vice versa) under 6 Del. C. § 18-211.

Definition

Statutory conversion allows a non-LLC entity to become a Delaware LLC, or vice versa, without dissolving and re-forming. Codified at 6 Del. C. § 18-211 and 8 Del. C. § 266. State fee: $200 for the Certificate of Conversion plus the new Certificate of Formation fee.

Context

Conversion preserves entity history, contracts, and bank accounts; new formation does not.

Example

A founder operating as a sole proprietorship converts to a Delaware LLC. Contracts, EIN, and bank accounts can typically continue under the converted entity.

Common pitfalls

  • Federal tax implications can include gain recognition.
  • All members or owners must consent.
  • Some states do not recognize statutory conversion; foreign-qualification needs separate handling.

What statutory conversion actually means in practice

Statutory conversion is a procedure created by state law that lets a business change its legal form while remaining, in the eyes of the law, the same continuing entity. The Delaware statutes that govern it for limited liability companies are 6 Del. C. section 18-211 and, on the corporation side, 8 Del. C. section 266. The core idea is continuity. Rather than shutting one entity down and opening a new one, the existing entity sheds one legal skin and puts on another. Its identity, its contracts, its history, and in many cases its tax identification number carry forward. For a founder who has spent months building relationships, signing agreements, and opening accounts, that continuity is the entire point.

In day to day terms, a conversion is a filing event plus an internal authorization event. The internal side is the consent of the owners, who agree to change the form. The external side is a Certificate of Conversion filed with the Delaware Division of Corporations, paired with the formation document of the new form. For a non-LLC entity becoming a Delaware LLC, that pairing is a Certificate of Conversion alongside a Certificate of Formation. The state fee structure is the $200 conversion fee plus the formation fee for the new entity. The base Certificate of Formation fee in Delaware is $110, so a founder converting into a Delaware LLC budgets for both line items rather than treating them as one.

This is general information and not legal advice. The mechanics of any single conversion turn on the law of the origin jurisdiction, the destination jurisdiction, and the federal tax treatment that follows. A founder should treat the statute as the skeleton and a qualified adviser as the muscle that makes it move correctly.

Why conversion matters more than re-formation

The alternative to conversion is dissolution and fresh formation. On paper they can look similar because both end with the entity the founder wants. The difference shows up in everything attached to the old entity. When a business dissolves and re-forms, its contracts do not automatically travel to the new entity. Each counterparty may need to consent to an assignment, and some contracts forbid assignment without permission. Bank accounts close and reopen under a new tax identity. Vendor relationships, payment processor approvals, and any accumulated operating history reset to zero. The glossary entry for this term states the point directly, that conversion preserves entity history, contracts, and bank accounts while new formation does not.

For a non-resident founder, the cost of losing that history is often larger than it first appears. Getting a US business bank account approved from abroad can take patience and documentation, and a payment processor that has already underwritten an account is reluctant to start over. A statutory conversion lets the founder keep the underwriting relationship and the account history because, legally, the account holder has not changed. The entity that signed the account agreement is the same entity, now wearing a different form. That single fact can save weeks of friction.

Conversion also preserves the chain of obligations. Liabilities do not vanish in a conversion, which is sometimes a disadvantage but more often a feature, because counterparties can rely on the entity remaining answerable for what it agreed to. That reliability is part of why conversion is the standard tool when a business wants to change form without disrupting the people it already does business with.

How conversion applies to a single-member foreign-owned LLC

Most non-resident founders who form a Delaware LLC start as a single-member entity owned by one individual living outside the United States. For that founder, statutory conversion usually appears in one of two directions. The first is converting an existing foreign business or a sole proprietorship into a Delaware LLC, in order to gain US presence and a US legal home. The second is converting the Delaware LLC into a Delaware corporation later, often a C-corporation, when the business wants to raise priced equity. Both directions use the same statutory machinery of consent plus filing.

A single-member LLC simplifies the consent step because there is only one owner whose agreement is required. There is no minority member to negotiate with and no class of interests to reconcile. That does not remove the federal tax analysis, which is where most of the real complexity sits for foreign owners. A single-member foreign-owned LLC is, by default, a disregarded entity for US federal income tax. Converting it into a corporation changes that classification entirely, because a corporation is its own taxpayer. The founder moves from a pass-through information-reporting world into a corporate-filing world, and the federal forms that follow are different.

The practical takeaway is that the headcount of members does not change whether conversion is available, but it shapes how heavy the internal paperwork is and, more importantly, how the federal tax picture shifts. A founder should map the tax consequence before filing, not after, because the filing itself can be a taxable event.

A worked example: sole proprietorship into a Delaware LLC

Consider a designer based in Lagos who has been freelancing as an unincorporated sole proprietor, invoicing clients directly and collecting payment through a personal arrangement. She wants a US business identity to access US payment rails and to separate her personal exposure from her work. The glossary example for this term describes exactly this path, a founder operating as a sole proprietorship who converts to a Delaware LLC so that contracts, the tax identification number, and bank accounts can typically continue under the converted entity.

In her case, the sequence is to authorize the change as the sole owner, then file the Certificate of Conversion with the new Certificate of Formation in Delaware. She budgets $200 for the conversion plus $110 for the formation. Because she is moving from an unincorporated operation rather than another formal entity, much of the value is in the forward-looking continuity. Her existing client agreements, where the counterparty is willing, can carry into the LLC, and she avoids re-papering each relationship from scratch.

One detail she cannot skip is the federal layer. A sole proprietorship reports on the owner's individual return, while a foreign-owned single-member LLC has its own information-reporting duties. After conversion she will need an Employer Identification Number for the LLC if she does not already have one, and she should expect to handle Form 5472 with a pro forma Form 1120 each year. The conversion solves the legal-form problem, but it opens a US filing obligation that did not exist when she was a bare freelancer.

A worked example: Delaware LLC into a Delaware corporation

Now take a different founder, a developer in Bangalore running a software product through a single-member Delaware LLC. The product gains traction and an investor offers a priced seed round. Most institutional investors prefer to fund corporations rather than LLCs, because corporate stock fits cleanly into their fund structures and option pools. The glossary covers this scenario through the related term for LLC conversion to a C-corporation, which uses 6 Del. C. section 18-211 together with 8 Del. C. section 266.

His path is to authorize the conversion, file the Certificate of Conversion, and file a Certificate of Incorporation that establishes the new Delaware corporation. The single member becomes the holder of the founding shares. From that point the entity is a separate taxpayer, the operating agreement gives way to bylaws and a stockholders arrangement, and the company can issue the stock the investor expects. The continuity benefit still applies, because the company keeps its history, its contracts, and its banking relationship while changing form.

The cost here is rarely the filing fee. It is the tax and timing analysis. Converting can trigger gain recognition depending on facts, and special stock-related timing rules can be affected by the date of conversion. For a foreign founder this also means stepping into corporate-level US tax exposure that a disregarded LLC did not carry. The lesson the example teaches is to involve a tax adviser before filing, because the order and timing of steps can change the result.

How conversion connects to formation steps

Conversion and formation are two ends of the same statutory toolkit, and a non-resident founder usually meets formation first. The standard starting point is a Delaware Certificate of Formation, filed for a base state fee of $110, which brings the LLC into legal existence. Conversion enters the picture only when the founder already has an entity or an operating identity and wants to change its form rather than create a new one. Understanding both lets the founder choose deliberately instead of defaulting to whichever path a service provider happens to offer.

When a conversion produces a Delaware LLC, the destination document is the same Certificate of Formation that an ordinary new LLC files. That is why the fee math adds the $110 formation charge to the $200 conversion charge. The founder is, in a real sense, forming the new entity and converting into it at the same moment. The difference from a plain formation is that the converting entity carries its prior life along with it instead of being born empty.

It helps to think of formation as the document that creates a form and conversion as the document that swaps one created form for another. A founder who has mapped the formation step already understands most of what the destination side of a conversion requires. The conversion certificate is the bridge, and the formation certificate is the far bank.

How conversion connects to banking

Banking is where the continuity value of conversion becomes concrete for founders operating from abroad. A US business account, whether at a fintech provider or a chartered bank, is opened in the name and tax identity of a specific entity. Providers that non-resident founders commonly use include Mercury, Wise, Relay, Lili, and Payoneer. Each of these underwrites the entity behind the account, reviewing its formation documents, its ownership, and its tax identification number before approving access.

Because a statutory conversion keeps the entity legally continuous, the account it holds can often remain in place. The account holder did not dissolve and a new one did not appear. The same entity simply changed form. In practice the provider will still want updated documentation reflecting the new form, such as the new Certificate of Formation or Certificate of Incorporation and any changed tax identity, and some providers handle a change of form more gracefully than others. A founder should notify the provider in advance rather than assume the account silently survives.

Contrast that with dissolution and re-formation, which forces a new account application and fresh underwriting. For a founder who waited weeks for an initial approval, repeating that process is a real cost. Conversion is the route that lets the banking relationship persist, which is one of the strongest practical reasons to choose it over starting over. None of this guarantees a specific provider outcome, because each one sets its own policy.

How conversion connects to US tax filings

Tax is the area where conversion most often surprises non-resident founders, because changing legal form can change tax classification. A foreign-owned single-member Delaware LLC is treated as a disregarded entity by default, and its central federal duty is to file Form 5472 attached to a pro forma Form 1120 each year, reporting reportable transactions between the LLC and its foreign owner. The penalty for failing to file Form 5472 is $25,000, which makes this obligation one a founder cannot treat casually. Conversion into a corporation moves the entity out of the disregarded category and into corporate taxpayer status, with a different filing footprint.

Before any of those filings can happen, the entity needs an Employer Identification Number. The EIN is free when obtained directly from the IRS by submitting Form SS-4, and for a foreign founder without a US Social Security Number the processing typically takes around eight to ten business days. A conversion that creates or changes a tax-relevant entity is a good moment to confirm the EIN situation, because a new corporate form may need its own number while a continuing LLC may carry its existing one.

The federal pitfall the glossary flags is real, that conversion can include gain recognition. Whether tax is owed depends on the specific facts of the entity, its assets, and the direction of the conversion. This is general information and not tax advice, and the $25,000 figure for Form 5472 underscores why a founder should map filing duties before and after the conversion rather than discovering them afterward.

The role of owner consent and authorization

Every statutory conversion rests on a foundation of owner consent. The glossary lists this plainly as a pitfall, that all members or owners must consent. Without proper authorization, the conversion is not validly approved, no matter how clean the state filing looks. For a single-member LLC this step is light, because the one owner simply records the decision. For an entity with several members or with classes of interests, the authorization can require a vote, written consents, or specific approval thresholds set by the governing document.

The governing document matters because it can set a higher bar than the statute. An operating agreement might require unanimous consent for a fundamental change like conversion, or it might give certain members veto rights. A founder should read the operating agreement before assuming a simple majority suffices. The statutory default and the contractual override interact, and the stricter of the two usually controls. Skipping this analysis is how conversions get challenged later by an owner who claims the change was never properly approved.

Documenting consent cleanly protects everyone. A written consent or resolution that names the conversion, the destination form, and the agreement of each required owner creates a record that the change was authorized. For a foreign founder operating remotely, keeping that paper trail is doubly important, because remote operations make it harder to reconstruct who agreed to what after the fact. The filing is the public act, and the consent is the private act that legitimizes it.

Edge case: when the origin state does not recognize conversion

One of the sharpest pitfalls the glossary names is that some states do not recognize statutory conversion, and that foreign qualification then needs separate handling. Statutory conversion is a creature of state law, and not every state has adopted the same provisions or the same willingness to recognize an entity converting out of its jurisdiction. If the origin state lacks a conversion mechanism, the clean one-document path may not be available, and the founder may face a more involved process such as a merger or a domestication, or in the hardest cases a dissolution and re-formation.

For a non-resident founder this matters most when the starting entity exists in a home country rather than in a US state. Delaware can accept a non-US entity converting into a Delaware LLC under its statute, but the home jurisdiction must also permit the entity to leave or to continue elsewhere. If the home country treats the conversion as a liquidation, the tax and legal picture changes sharply. The Delaware side may be straightforward while the foreign side imposes its own consequences.

The practical move is to confirm, before filing in Delaware, that the origin jurisdiction will recognize the entity's exit or transformation. If it will not, the founder needs an alternative structure. This is exactly the kind of cross-border question where general information runs out and jurisdiction-specific advice becomes necessary, because the answer depends entirely on two bodies of law meeting at the entity.

Edge case: foreign qualification and converting an out-of-state entity

Foreign qualification is a separate concept that founders often confuse with conversion. Qualifying as a foreign entity means registering an existing entity to do business in a state other than the one where it was formed. It does not change the entity's form or its home state. Conversion, by contrast, changes the form and can change the home state. The two tools solve different problems, and using the wrong one leaves the founder with the wrong result.

Where they intersect is when an entity formed in one state converts into a Delaware entity. The glossary pitfall notes that foreign qualification needs separate handling in conversion scenarios. If a business was qualified to operate in several states under its old form, those qualifications may need to be updated, withdrawn, or re-filed to reflect the converted entity. A conversion in Delaware does not automatically ripple out to every state where the business was registered, so the founder has follow-on filings to manage.

For a non-resident founder running a US-facing business, this usually surfaces if the business has nexus in a state beyond Delaware, such as a physical presence or employees somewhere. Most early single-member foreign-owned LLCs operate only through Delaware and US payment rails, so additional qualifications may not apply. But the moment the business touches another state in a way that creates registration duties, the conversion analysis has to account for those qualifications separately rather than assuming the Delaware filing covers them.

Related terms and where conversion sits among them

Statutory conversion connects to several neighboring concepts that a founder benefits from understanding together. The Delaware LLC Act is the statutory home of 6 Del. C. section 18-211, the provision that authorizes conversion for LLCs, so the Act is the parent framework. The Delaware Certificate of Formation is the destination document when the conversion produces an LLC, which is why the two terms are linked. Reading conversion alongside these two clarifies that conversion is not a standalone trick but an operation defined inside the broader Delaware entity system.

Two other related terms sharpen the picture. The LLC conversion to a C-corporation is the specific, common application of conversion that founders meet when raising venture capital, and it uses both the LLC statute and the corporation statute together. Successor liability is the doctrine that governs whether liabilities follow an entity through a transaction, and it is relevant because conversion preserves liabilities by keeping the entity continuous, which is a different outcome from an asset purchase that can leave liabilities behind.

Holding these terms in one frame helps a founder choose the right tool. If the goal is to change form while keeping everything attached, conversion is the answer. If the goal is to acquire assets while shedding old liabilities, an asset purchase governed by successor-liability rules is a different path. The vocabulary matters because each word points to a distinct legal mechanism with distinct consequences.

Common misunderstandings about statutory conversion

The most frequent misunderstanding is that conversion is a tax-free reshuffling because the entity stays continuous. Legal continuity and tax neutrality are not the same thing. The glossary is explicit that federal tax implications can include gain recognition. An entity can remain the same legal person while the federal tax code treats the change of form as a recognition event. A founder who assumes conversion is automatically tax-free can walk into an unexpected bill, which is why the tax analysis belongs at the front of the process and not the end.

A second misunderstanding is that conversion erases the old entity's liabilities. It does not. Because the entity is continuous, its obligations travel with it. That is usually intended, since continuity is the goal, but a founder hoping to leave debts behind by converting will be disappointed. A third misunderstanding is that a Delaware conversion automatically resolves filings in every other state or country the business touches. It does not, and foreign qualification or home-country recognition must be handled on their own.

A final misconception is that conversion and BOI reporting are linked in some special way. Under the FinCEN Interim Final Rule of March 26 2025, US-formed entities such as a Delaware LLC are exempt from beneficial ownership information reporting, so a domestic conversion does not create a new BOI duty for a US-formed entity. Treating these myths as facts leads founders astray, so the safer posture is to verify each assumption against the statute and against current adviser guidance rather than against intuition.

Putting conversion in the founder's overall sequence

For a non-resident founder, conversion rarely stands alone. It sits inside a longer sequence that usually runs from forming or holding an entity, to obtaining an EIN, to opening banking, to meeting annual obligations. Each of those steps interacts with a conversion. Forming defines the entity, the EIN gives it a federal tax identity that a conversion may carry or change, banking depends on the entity staying continuous, and the annual obligations follow whatever form the entity ends up in. Seeing conversion as one move within this chain keeps the founder from treating it as an isolated filing.

The recurring annual duties are part of that chain. A Delaware LLC owes a flat franchise tax of $300 due each June 1, regardless of income, and a foreign-owned single-member LLC carries the Form 5472 and pro forma Form 1120 duty with its $25,000 penalty for non-filing. When a conversion changes the form, it can change which of these duties apply. Converting into a corporation, for instance, replaces the disregarded-entity filing posture with a corporate one. A founder should re-check the calendar of obligations after any conversion rather than assuming the prior schedule still fits.

Cost-wise, the conversion itself is modest next to the value it protects. The state charges $200 for the conversion plus $110 for a new Certificate of Formation when the destination is an LLC. Set against the weeks of friction saved on banking and contracts, that is a small line item. This is general information rather than legal or tax advice, and the right sequence for any single founder depends on facts a qualified adviser should review before filing.

Related terms

Related glossary terms & guides